A case scenario study for the assessment of physician's behavior in the management of COPD: the WHY study
Loading...
Date
2018
Authors
Kılınç, Oğuz
Konya, Aylin
Akgün, Metin
Sayıner, Abdullah
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Dove Medical Press Ltd
Abstract
Purpose: COPD diagnosis is mainly based on clinical judgment of physicians. Physicians do not also refer to COPD guidelines in their daily practice. This study aimed to assess attitudes of physicians regarding COPD diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up and to identify the factors influencing physicians' decisions in clinical practice. Patients and methods: Fifty physicians were selected from 12 EuroStat NUTS 2 regions and asked to assess seven fictitious case scenarios. The following five scenarios described patients with COPD: Case Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) A-smoker and Case GOLD A-nonsmoker were previously undiagnosed patients presenting with dyspnea, Case GOLD D-smoker and GOLD B-exsmoker were COPD patients presenting with exacerbation, Case GOLD B-smoker was a previously diagnosed COPD patient with dyspnea in stable phase, Case asthma-COPD overlap syndrome, and Case obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Patients' history, physical examination findings, pulmonary function tests, and X-ray images were prepared before the study by an experts' committee and provided to the physicians upon their request, until they reached a final decision. The physicians completed a questionnaire including information about their clinical practices and institutions. Results: According to the GOLD 2015 recommendations, of the physicians, 44% performed guideline-concordant diagnosis in the first five scenarios, who were all COPD patients, and 6% performed guideline-concordant diagnosis in all cases. There was a negative correlation between high workload and making a guideline-concordant diagnosis (P=0.038, rho =-0.417). Even when the physicians made a guideline-concordant diagnosis of COPD, only a minority (10%-22%) used the GOLD classification. Logistic regression analysis revealed that working in a tertiary health care center was a significant factor in favor of establishing a guidelineconcordant diagnosis of COPD (P=0.029, OR = 6.139 [95% CI: 1.20-31.32]). Conclusion: Management of COPD patients in Turkey does not generally follow the GOLD criteria but is rather based on physicians' clinical experience. Heavy workload appears to adversely affect the correctness of clinical decisions.
Description
Keywords
Respiratory system, COPD, Practice pattern, Real-life scenario, Physician decision, GOLD criteria, Guidelines, Disease, Classification, Adherence, Patient, Turkey
Citation
Kılınç, O. vd. (2018). ''A case scenario study for the assessment of physician's behavior in the management of COPD: the WHY study''. International Journal of COPD, 13, 2751-2758.