Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology

dc.contributor.buuauthorOrhan, Adnan
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzerkan, Kemal
dc.contributor.buuauthorVuruskan, Hakan
dc.contributor.buuauthorOcakoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.buuauthorKasapoğlu, Işıl
dc.contributor.buuauthorKoşan, Bahadır
dc.contributor.buuauthorUncu, Gürkan
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7558-8166tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridV-5292-2019tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-1958-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAT-3479-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9791-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridHLG-6346-2023tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5180-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56671094200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603345841tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6507328150tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid15832295800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid55800494800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57205391969tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603716169tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T12:53:25Z
dc.date.available2023-10-18T12:53:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesisNumerous studies have found that the short-term results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse are safe and effective. This study evaluates the long-term results of the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy operation between the urology and gynecology branches.MethodsA prospective study enrolling 206 patients was conducted to evaluate laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as a surgical treatment for vaginal vault prolapse from 2011 to 2014. Two different surgical branches (urology and gynecology) applied laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy to their patients with their own techniques. The long-term results were assessed postoperatively after 4years by pelvic examinations, including the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) and quality-of-life assessments using validated questionnaires.ResultsA total of 190 patients (94 urology and 96 gynecology patients) received a full clinical follow-up examination between April 2014-June 2018. Postoperative pelvic organ prolapse recurrence rates in each compartment were similar in both groups during the 4years; 87.2% of the urology and 86.5% of the gynecology patients had no prolapse in any compartment according to the POP-Q system. The reoperation rate was 5.3% for the urology and 6.2% for the gynecology group. Mesh erosion was detected in two patients in both groups. Three patients responded to local estrogen therapy, and we removed the mesh vaginally in one patient. The subjective cure rate was 89.4% in the urology and 88.5% in the gynecology group after 4years.ConclusionsAlthough different surgical branches perform laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with their own techniques, long-term anatomical and functional results are similar between the branches. From a urogynecological point of view, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a gold standard surgical procedure that can be performed by both urologists and gynecologists with similar long-term outcomes.tr_TR
dc.identifier.citationOrhan, A. (2019). "Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology". International Urogynecology Journal, 30(4), 623-632.tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage632tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462
dc.identifier.issue4tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed30627828tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059866866tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage623tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-03858-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-018-03858-w
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/34433
dc.identifier.volume30tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000463705300014
dc.identifier.wos000463705300014
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherSpringertr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.relation.journalInternational Urogynecology Journaltr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexytr_TR
dc.subjectLong-term follow-uptr_TR
dc.subjectGynecologytr_TR
dc.subjectUrologytr_TR
dc.subjectVaginal vault prolapsetr_TR
dc.subjectAbdominal sacrocolpopexytr_TR
dc.subjectRobotic sacrocolpopexytr_TR
dc.subjectHysterectomytr_TR
dc.subjectOutcomestr_TR
dc.subjectSurgerytr_TR
dc.subjectRepairtr_TR
dc.subjectWomentr_TR
dc.subjectCosttr_TR
dc.subjectMeshtr_TR
dc.subjectObstetrics & gynecologyen_US
dc.subjectUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeEstrogentr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAdulttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeArticletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeCohort analysistr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeConstipationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeEstrogen therapytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeFemaletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeFollow uptr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeHumantr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeIntermethod comparisontr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeLaparoscopic surgerytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMicturition disordertr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle agedtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePelvic organ prolapse quantificationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePostoperative complicationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePriority journaltr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeProspective studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeQuality of life assessmenttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeRecurrence risktr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeReoperationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeSacrocolpopexytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeStress incontinencetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment responsetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeUrge incontinencetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeVaginal vault prolapsetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAdverse device effecttr_TR
dc.subject.meshFemaletr_TR
dc.subject.meshFollow-up studiestr_TR
dc.subject.meshGynecologytr_TR
dc.subject.meshHumanstr_TR
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopytr_TR
dc.subject.meshMiddle agedtr_TR
dc.subject.meshPelvic organ prolapsetr_TR
dc.subject.meshPostoperative complicationstr_TR
dc.subject.meshQuality of lifetr_TR
dc.subject.meshRecurrencetr_TR
dc.subject.meshReoperationtr_TR
dc.subject.meshSacrumtr_TR
dc.subject.meshSurgical meshtr_TR
dc.subject.meshTime factorstr_TR
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcometr_TR
dc.subject.meshUrologytr_TR
dc.subject.meshVaginatr_TR
dc.subject.scopusSacrocolpopexy; Pelvis Floor; Hymenen_US
dc.subject.wosObstetrics & gynecologytr_TR
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrologytr_TR
dc.titleLong-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: Comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecologytr_TR
dc.typeArticle

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: