Comparison of conventional coproscopical, methods and commercial coproantigen ELISA kits for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections in dogs and cats

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Christian
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇırak, Veli Yılgör
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Parazitoloji Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T08:47:42Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T08:47:42Z
dc.date.issued2004-09
dc.description.abstractFaecal samples of 270 dogs and 100 cats from 3 animal shelters in Germany were comparatively examined using conventional coproscopical methods and commercial coproantigen ELISA kits for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections. Giardia cysts were found in 9.5% and 0% of the faecal samples in dogs and cats, respectively, examined once using the ZnCl2-NaCl flotation. However, the Giardia coproantigen ELISA (ProSpecT(R) Giardia Microplate Assay) was positive in 29.5% and 22.4% of the samples from dogs and cats, respectively. Direct faecal smears stained with carbol fuchsin showed Cryptosporidium oocysts in one dog (0.4%) and one cat (1%). In contrast, the Cryptosporidium coproantigen ELISA (ProSpecT(R) Cryptosporidium Microplate Assay) reacted positively in 23% of the samples from dogs and 30% of the samples from cats. Both coproantigen ELISAs were more often positive in coproscopically Giordia-negative canine faecal samples that contained Isospora burrowsi/ohioensis oocysts than in faecal samples without any parasite stage. Possible reasons for these observations are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBauer, C. ve Çırak, V. Y. (2004). “Comparison of conventional coproscopical, methods and commercial coproantigen ELISA kits for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections in dogs and cats”. Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 117(9-10), 410-413.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage413tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0005-9366
dc.identifier.issue9-10tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed15495932tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-4544349725tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage410tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15495932/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/21247
dc.identifier.volume117tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000223809200008tr_TR
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSchluetersche Verlagsgesellschaft Mbh & Co Kgen_US
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.relation.journalBerliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschriften_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGiardiaen_US
dc.subjectCryptosporidiumen_US
dc.subjectDogen_US
dc.subjectCaten_US
dc.subjectFaecal examinationsen_US
dc.subjectCoproantigen ELISAen_US
dc.subjectGastrointestinal parasitesen_US
dc.subjectIntestinal parasitesen_US
dc.subjectEnzyme-immunoassayen_US
dc.subjectFecal examinationen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectPerthen_US
dc.subjectVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.subject.wosVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.titleComparison of conventional coproscopical, methods and commercial coproantigen ELISA kits for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections in dogs and catsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US

Files

License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Web of Science