Central mechanism underlying pressor and bradycardic effect of intracerebroventricularly injected arachidonic acid
Date
2011-02
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to determine the central cyclooxygenase (COX) pathway and central thromboxane signaling in the cardiovascular effects evoked by arachidonic acid (AA). As a main control for the study, different doses of AA (75, 150, or 300 mu g) were administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.). Centrally injected AA dose- and time-dependently increased mean arterial pressure and decreased heart rate in conscious normotensive Sprague-Dawley rats. The maximal cardiovascular effects of AA were observed at min 10 of the injection and lasted almost 30 min. To investigate the central mechanism of the AA-induced cardiovascular effect in conscious normotensive animals, pretreatment with nonselective COX inhibitor indomethacin (200 mu g; i.c.v.), thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) synthesis inhibitor furegrelate (250 or 500 mu g; i.c.v.), or TXA2 receptor antagonist SQ-29548 (8 or 16 mu g; i.c.v.) was carried out 15 min before AA (150 mu g; i.c.v.) injection. While indomethacin completely prevented the pressor and bradycardic responses to AA, furegrelate and SQ-29548 attenuated these effects in part in awake normotensive rats. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the pressor and bradycardic cardiovascular effects of centrally injected AA are dependent on COX activity being totally central and the TXA(2) signaling pathway being subsequently central, at least in part.
Description
Keywords
Pharmacology & pharmacy, Physiology, Sympatho-adrenomedullary outflow, Central cholinergic system, Hemorrhaged hypotensive rats, Normotensive conscious rats, Thromboxane a2 analog, Peripheral mechanisms, Blood-pressure, Newborn pigs, Involvement, Activation
Citation
Yalçın, M. vd. (2011). "Central mechanism underlying pressor and bradycardic effect of intracerebroventricularly injected arachidonic acid". Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 89(2), 127-133.