Publication:
A comparison of safety and efficacy of sublingual captopril with sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive crisis

dc.contributor.authorGemici, K.
dc.contributor.authorKarakoç, Y.
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, A.
dc.contributor.authorBaran, I.
dc.contributor.authorGüllülü, S.
dc.contributor.authorCordan, J.
dc.contributor.buuauthorGemici, Kani
dc.contributor.buuauthorKarakoç, Yüksel
dc.contributor.buuauthorErsoy, Alpaslan
dc.contributor.buuauthorBaran, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.buuauthorGüllülü, Sümeyye
dc.contributor.buuauthorCordan, Jale
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentKardiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.scopusid6602927677
dc.contributor.scopusid6701758003
dc.contributor.scopusid35612977100
dc.contributor.scopusid35572557400
dc.contributor.scopusid57204660708
dc.contributor.scopusid6602518666
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T14:30:00Z
dc.date.issued1999-01-01
dc.description.abstractSublingual nifedipine is commonly used in hypertensive crisis, however, it may result in several adverse effects such as reflex tachycardia, headache, and flushing. Research is continuing to find a new drug that has the same efficiency and fewer side effects. Sublingual captopril, a new preparation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lowers blood pressure. It is not known whether it is effective in these emergent clinical settings. Therefore we designed a randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of those two drugs in hypertensive crisis. Eighty patients (32 male and 48 female) with hypertensive crisis were included in the study; their mean age was 43.4 ± 7.9 years. Nifedipine 10 mg was given sublingually to 34 and captopril 25 mg to 46 patients randomly. There was no difference between the two drugs with respect to their antihypertensive effect. Heart rate significantly dropped (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) in the patients taking captopril, but no changes were observed in the patients taking nifedipine. Twenty-three of 34 patients taking nifedipine encountered adverse effects. Adverse effects were observed in only three patients taking captopril (p < 0.001). Sublingual captopril is as effective as and has less side effects than sublingual nifedipine. Because sublingual captopril has fewer side effects, it may be safer than nifedipine in the treatment of hypertensive crisis.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF01616442
dc.identifier.endpage 149
dc.identifier.issn1061-1711
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0032987073
dc.identifier.startpage 147
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52966
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer New York
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Angiology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subject.scopusHypertensive Crisis Management in Emergency Settings
dc.titleA comparison of safety and efficacy of sublingual captopril with sublingual nifedipine in hypertensive crisis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/ Kardiyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı

Files

Collections