Publication:
Diode laser in the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement: A preliminary study

dc.contributor.authorOktay, B.
dc.contributor.authorKılıçarslan, H.
dc.contributor.authorDoǧan, H.S.
dc.contributor.authorKordan, Y.
dc.contributor.authorYavaşcaoǧlu, I.
dc.contributor.authorVuruşkan, H.
dc.contributor.buuauthorKILIÇARSLAN, HAKAN
dc.contributor.buuauthorYAVAŞCAOĞLU, İSMET
dc.contributor.buuauthorVURUŞKAN, HAKAN
dc.contributor.buuauthorOktay, Bülent
dc.contributor.buuauthorDoǧan, Hasan Serkan
dc.contributor.buuauthorKordan, Yakup
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentÜroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.scopusid 6602172127
dc.contributor.scopusid56007473800
dc.contributor.scopusid7005856022
dc.contributor.scopusid9633365800
dc.contributor.scopusid6603612497
dc.contributor.scopusid6507328150
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T10:21:18Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel treatment diode laser, in treatment of benign prostatic enlargement. Materials and methods: We evaluated the surgical and functional outcomes of 85 patients who underwent diode laser treatment for benign prostatic enlargement between September 2007 and April 2009. Preoperative and postoperative the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), maximum flow rate, postvoiding residual urine, and prostate volumes were analyzed. Results: All the patients were considered clinically as having benign prostatic enlargement. Mean age was 70.8±8.6 years and follow-up period was 12.6±6 months. In all patients, the power used was 120 W, the mean applied energy was 190±70 kJ and the total laser time was 21.9±7.2 min. Improvement in functional outcomes began in the third postoperative month and was sustained through 12 months postoperatively. Compared to preoperative data, at postoperative 12 months, we detected a significant decrease in prostate volumes (55.5±27.6 mL vs. 42.8±21.7 mL), IPSS (21.6±4.75 vs. 4.6±3.3) and residual urine volume (89.5±85.6 mL vs. 30.4±22.4 mL), and a significant increase in maximum flow rates (18.7±6.9 mL/sec vs. 9.6±5.6 mL/sec). No difference was detected in IIEF scores (36.8±21.2 vs. 37.8±23.7). Re-treatment was required in 5.8% of patients, and retrograde ejaculation was reported in 17% of patients. Conclusion: The early results of diode laser treatment for benign prostatic enlargement were equivalent to other endoscopic and minimally invasive treatments.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tud.2011.005
dc.identifier.endpage 29
dc.identifier.issn1300-5804
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79953322675
dc.identifier.startpage25
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/52592
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAVES
dc.relation.journalTurk Uroloji Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectMinimally invasive
dc.subjectLaser
dc.subjectDiode
dc.subjectBenign prostatic enlargement
dc.subject.scopusProstate Hypertrophy; Transurethral Resection; Quality of Life
dc.titleDiode laser in the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement: A preliminary study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublication97a09c20-e30a-413a-8e4b-2e773b1beb77
relation.isAuthorOfPublication457d116a-1243-4450-804b-3e670de18420
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2ca52f73-e8e4-425c-b8d2-b17047ba50a1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery97a09c20-e30a-413a-8e4b-2e773b1beb77

Files

Collections