Publication:
Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire

dc.contributor.authorDallı, Ö. Erbay
dc.contributor.authorDerinpınar, K. Bağcı
dc.contributor.buuauthorERBAY DALLI, ÖZNUR
dc.contributor.buuauthorBAĞCI DERİNPINAR, KÜBRA
dc.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentİç Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.departmentHemşirelik Bölümü
dc.contributor.scopusid58776700300
dc.contributor.scopusid59014023200
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-12T22:24:49Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: Alarm fatigue may endanger the safety of patients by negatively affecting nurses' concentration and ability to provide effective care. Identifying alarm fatigue and taking appropriate measures are critical in preventing medical errors and for nurses to work with high motivation. This study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the 23-item Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire (AFAQ). Method: The study was conducted between February 2022 and April 2022 and included nurses with at least one year of clinical or intensive care experience. The data were collected via a web-based questionnaire. During the adaptation of AFAQ, language, content, and construct validity were evaluated; reliability was examined by internal consistency analysis. Results: The item and scale content validity index of AFAQ were found to be high (>0.80). The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy indicated an adequate sampling (0.85); Bartlett's test of sphericity χ2 was 1935.074, p < 0.001. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the 21-item scale had a five-factor structure, explaining 51.606% of the total variance, and the factor loadings of the items were >0.30 (0.422−0.803). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the five-factor model had a good fit index (χ2/df = 1.855, SRMR = 0.039, RMSEA = 0.048, CFI = 0.915, and TLI = 0.908) and appropriate factor loadings (>0.30). The internal consistency of AFAQ (Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was 0.85, and the corrected item-total correlations were between 0.32−0.55. Conclusion: The results indicated that the Turkish version of the Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire was sufficiently valid and reliable to measure alarm fatigue in nurses.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enfi.2023.06.002
dc.identifier.endpage123
dc.identifier.issn1130-2399
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192080359
dc.identifier.startpage114
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/51287
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEdiciones Doyma, S. L.
dc.relation.journalEnfermeria Intensiva
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectValidity
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectAlarm fatigue
dc.subject.scopusAlarm Monitor; Physiologic Monitoring; Patient Safety
dc.titleAdaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Bölümü
local.contributor.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi/Hemşirelik Bölümü
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf5ea7325-3695-4e48-8e8b-24a8abdffba7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6636b09c-c945-4604-8dc6-90d20f267caf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf5ea7325-3695-4e48-8e8b-24a8abdffba7

Files

Collections