2018 Sayı 30

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/13254

Browse

Browsing by Language "en"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An inquiry on relation among discourse, truth and power in Michel Foucault
    (Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2018-03-15) Becermen, Metin; Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi; Felsefe Bölümü; 0000-0002-7585-265X
    Foucault calls his work “a critical history of the thought.” However, the critical history of the thought is the time, when any truth games appear, but not the time, when the truth is obtained or hindered. This history is directly linked to the power and to how the power operates. Foucault, who also deals with the power matter in line with the relation between discourse, truth and power, inquires function of the power in any enclosed institutions formed depending on development conditions of the capitalism such as hospitals, jails, etc. His main problem is to deal with the power by acting with any power relationship and to make a power solution accordingly. In this context, Foucault also adopts the states as a matter depending on analysis of modern institutions. He thinks that there is a resistance opportunity in wherever the power is available. Resistance means in some ways setting forth a different discourse and developing a game other than the power game. Therefore, Foucault, who thinks that, when the power is at stake, one should go out of the existing game and leave the state our of the game, makes a critical room for philosophy at this point.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    With a representative example the roles of reason and emotion in western and islamic legal systems
    (Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2017-02-20) Türkbağ, Ahmet Ulvi
    The core of this study is to show the role of emotion and reason in two major legal systems, namely the Western and Islamic legal systems. Firstly, I will portray the two systems without any detail, in order to show emotion and reason balances in each of them. After that, I will choose a representative example to explain and state how they follow different roads of approach to reach an understanding of the balance between reason and emotion. As an assumption, it would be safe to say Western law is more widely known. Therefore, I will focus primarily on an illustration from Islamic Law using as my example a facet of Family law, a special kind of separation “lian or mulahana” which, I think, clearly represents the outlook of Islamic law on emotion.