Von der analytischen philosophie zu der phänomenologie: Von internamen zu den intersinnen
Loading...
Date
2020-03-25
Authors
Tarhan, Diler Ezgi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, was in den Philosophien von Frege und Husserl über die Beziehungen der Bedeutung der Justiz mit dem Inhalt der Justiz, den Inhalt mit der Bedeutung, die Bedeutung mit dem Objekt und das Objekt mit den Namen, gesagt wird, über die korrelative Bindung zwischen dem, was wir nennen, und dem, was wir meinen, zu diskutieren. Zu diesem Zweck wird die Husserl-Phänomenologie, mit der Bedeutung der von Frege gegründeten analytischen Tradition, beginnend mit den Dingen, die in die Sprache mit irgendeinem Name vertretet wird, seiner Meinung über Inhalt geprüft und den Unterschied der phänomenologischen Bedeutung mit der analytischen Bedeutunguntersucht. Nebenan werden auch die Nebenbedeutungen diskutiert, die mit diesem Problem in beiden Traditionen verbunden sind, und diese Diskussion, die über Husserl und Frege geführt wird, wird mit den Ansichten beider Philosophen über Konzepte wie Design, Objekt, Konzept, Denken und Phänomen erweitert.
The aim of this article is to discuss what is said in Frege and Husserl philosophy on the meaning of the judgment, the content of the judiciary, the meaning of the content, the meaning with the object, and the relation of the object with the names through the correlational link between what we name and what we mean. For this purpose, Husserl's phenomenology will be analyzed from the point of view of the meaning which represented with the name in the language of the analytical tradition that Frege was the founder and the difference of phenomenological meaning from analytical meaning will be investigated. On the other hand, the side meanings associated with this problem in both traditions will also be discussed and this discussion, which is carried out through Husserl and Frege, will be expanded with with the views of both philosophers about concepts such as design, object, concept, thought and fact relation.
The aim of this article is to discuss what is said in Frege and Husserl philosophy on the meaning of the judgment, the content of the judiciary, the meaning of the content, the meaning with the object, and the relation of the object with the names through the correlational link between what we name and what we mean. For this purpose, Husserl's phenomenology will be analyzed from the point of view of the meaning which represented with the name in the language of the analytical tradition that Frege was the founder and the difference of phenomenological meaning from analytical meaning will be investigated. On the other hand, the side meanings associated with this problem in both traditions will also be discussed and this discussion, which is carried out through Husserl and Frege, will be expanded with with the views of both philosophers about concepts such as design, object, concept, thought and fact relation.
Description
Keywords
Vorstellung, Gegenstand, Begriff, Gedanke, Sachverhalt, Design, Object, Concept, Thought, Fact relation
Citation
Tarhan, D. E. (2020). "Von der analytischen philosophie zu der phänomenologie: Von internamen zu den intersinnen". Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 19(1), 152-180.