Spinoza’nın antropomorfizm eleştirisi ya da aklın hayalgücünü ifşası üzerine
Loading...
Date
2013
Authors
Elmas, Mehmet Fatih
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Bir bütün olarak olgusal alan idelerle kurulan varlık alanıyla veya idelerin sunduğu idealler ölçüsünde determine edilir. Bu ideler “doğru” ve “yanlış” olabilirler. Yanlış bir ide kendi içerisinde tutarsız veya düzensiz bir saçmalık değildir, fakat onun da tıpkı doğru bir idede olduğu gibi kuralları ve bir dizgesi vardır. Bu bakımdan, yanlış ideler sistemin bir parçası olarak doğrunun oluşumu açısından zorunlulukla bulunur. Bu bağlamda, filozofun işi, her şeyden önce yanlış olanı teşhis ve teşhir etmek ve ardından doğru olanı ortaya koymak suretiyle yanlış olanı zihinlerden ötelemektir.
Factual area is determined in its whole either by the area of being that is constituted by ideals or by ideals themselves that is projected by ideas. Nevertheless, these ideas can either be “adequate” or “inadequate”. Yet an inadequate idea is not a idea that contains in itself inconsistent or disordered representations: it has its own rules and systematic epigenesis like an adequate idea. In this respect, inadequate ideas as an integral part of a system are required necessarily for the formation of adequateness as well. Prima facie, the task of philosopher is to recognise and to expose inadequateness. However, with the help of a argumentative thought-action one can aims to display such adequateness. Hence, the philosopher’s essential purpose is to dismiss inadequateness from human minds.
Factual area is determined in its whole either by the area of being that is constituted by ideals or by ideals themselves that is projected by ideas. Nevertheless, these ideas can either be “adequate” or “inadequate”. Yet an inadequate idea is not a idea that contains in itself inconsistent or disordered representations: it has its own rules and systematic epigenesis like an adequate idea. In this respect, inadequate ideas as an integral part of a system are required necessarily for the formation of adequateness as well. Prima facie, the task of philosopher is to recognise and to expose inadequateness. However, with the help of a argumentative thought-action one can aims to display such adequateness. Hence, the philosopher’s essential purpose is to dismiss inadequateness from human minds.
Description
Keywords
Spinoza, Tanrı, Antropomorphism, Hayalgücü, Akıl, Spinoza, God, Anthropomorfism, Imagination, Reason
Citation
Elmas, M. F. (2013). "Spinoza’nın antropomorfizm eleştirisi ya da aklın hayalgücünü ifşası üzerine". Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 21, 19-28.