Aristoteles'te etik
Loading...
Date
2007
Authors
Tekerek, İsmet
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Kimi çağdaş etik felsefelerini de besleyen en önemli kaynaklardan biri hiç kuşkusuz Aristotelesçi etiktir. Özellikle onun teori ve pratik ayrımında etiğin yeri hakkındaki düşünceleri önemlidir. Hayatın amacı olarak iyi" kavramı, düşünce ve karakter erdemleri ayrımı, ona olma ahlakı ve etikopolitik bir erdem olarak adalet, bir mutluluk etiği şeklinde ele alınabilecek Aristotelesçi Etik'in öne çıkan yanlarıdır. Temaşa etkinliği ise Aristotelesçi Etik'te ulaşılması gereken bir zirve olarak yerini bulur.
To be sure. One of the important sources that feeds some contemporary philosophies of ethics is Aristotclian ethics. Especially his thoughts concerning the place of ethics in the distinction of theory and practice are important. The concept of "good" as the aim of life. the distiction between intellectual and character virtues, morals of being middle, and justice is an ethicopolitical virtue are the themes that stand out the most in Aristotelian ethics, which could also be considered as the ethics of happiness. Activity or contemplation finds its place as the peak to be reached in Aristotelian Ethics.
To be sure. One of the important sources that feeds some contemporary philosophies of ethics is Aristotclian ethics. Especially his thoughts concerning the place of ethics in the distinction of theory and practice are important. The concept of "good" as the aim of life. the distiction between intellectual and character virtues, morals of being middle, and justice is an ethicopolitical virtue are the themes that stand out the most in Aristotelian ethics, which could also be considered as the ethics of happiness. Activity or contemplation finds its place as the peak to be reached in Aristotelian Ethics.
Description
Keywords
Aristoteles, Politika temaşa, Erdem, Etik, Aristotle, Compilation, Politics, Virtue, Ethics
Citation
Tekerek, İ. (2007). "Aristoteles'te etik ". Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 8, 91-105.