Publication:
Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types

dc.contributor.buuauthorUzun, Ayşen
dc.contributor.buuauthorBilgili, Uğur
dc.contributor.buuauthorSincik, Mehmet
dc.contributor.buuauthorFilya, Ismail
dc.contributor.buuauthorAçıkgöz, Esvet
dc.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentTarla Bitkileri Bölümü
dc.contributor.departmentHayvan Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1811-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1539-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-7431-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2927-2021
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T10:46:08Z
dc.date.available2021-07-07T10:46:08Z
dc.date.issued2005-01
dc.description.abstractTwo semi-leafless and five leafed pea (Pisium sativum L.) lines were evaluated for 4 years for dry matter, seed and crude protein yield under rainfed conditions in the Bursa region of Turkey. All the lines used in this study were forage, type with indeterminate growing habit. Several yield components such as spring vigor, plant height. lodging scores, pods/plant, seeds/pod, seeds/plant. 1000-seed weight, and harvest index were measured. Fora-e, dry matter and seed yield, and dry matter digestibility of the lines were determined. Under humid conditions and cool temperatures in early spring, high forage production was observed in all the lines. Fall seeded peas attained average 1.5 m height and produced 8.4 t ha(-1) dry matter. Dry matter yields varied significantly among lines, however, leaf type had no effect on forage yield. Significant differences in seed yield were found among the lines. An overall seed yield averaged 1.4 t ha(-1). Prior to flowering. semi-leafless lines had significantly better standing ability than leafed peas. Leaf-type had no effect on lodging scores at seed harvesting stage. Dry matter digestibility percentages were similar between leafed and semi-leafless pea lines.
dc.identifier.citationUzun, A. vd. (2005). "Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types". European Journal of Agronomy, 22(1), 85-94.
dc.identifier.endpage94
dc.identifier.issn1161-0301
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-10344241515
dc.identifier.startpage85
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.01.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030104000127
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/21157
dc.identifier.volume22
dc.identifier.wos000226505300008
dc.indexed.scopusScopus
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Agronomy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectPea
dc.subjectEvapotranspiration
dc.subjectPisum sativum L
dc.subjectLeafed
dc.subjectSemi-leafless
dc.subjectYield
dc.subjectDry matter digestibility
dc.subjectPisum-sativum l.
dc.subjectCompetition
dc.subjectDried peas
dc.subjectGrowth
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectMixtures
dc.subjectTraits
dc.subjectSeed
dc.subjectOats
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.subject.wosAgronomy
dc.titleYield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ1
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi/Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü
local.contributor.departmentZiraat Fakültesi/Hayvan Bilimleri Bölümü
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atScopus

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: