2024-01-092024-01-092016-05-05Sabur, H. vd. (2016). "Laser intervention on trabeculo-Descemet's membrane after resistant viscocanalostomy: Selective 532 nm gonioreconditioning or conventional 1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser goniopuncture?". Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 64(8), 568-571.0301-47381998-3689https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.191489https://journals.lww.com/ijo/fulltext/2016/64080/laser_intervention_on_trabeculo_descemet_s.5.aspxhttps://europepmc.org/article/PMC/5056543https://hdl.handle.net/11452/38898Purpose: To compare the results of conventional 1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum garnet laser goniopuncture (Nd:YAG-GP) and selective 532 nm Nd:YAG laser (selective laser trabeculoplasty [SLT]) gonioreconditioning (GR) on trabeculo-Descemet's membrane in eyes resistant to viscocanalostomy surgery. Methods: Thirty-eight eyes of 35 patients who underwent laser procedure after successful viscocanalostomy surgery were included in the study. When postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was above the individual target, the eyes were scheduled for laser procedure. Nineteen eyes underwent 532 nm SLT-GR (Group 1), and the remaining 19 eyes underwent conventional 1064 nm Nd:YAG-GP (Group 2). IOPs before and after laser (1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and last visit), follow-up periods, number of glaucoma medications, and complications were recorded for both groups. Results: Mean times from surgery to laser procedures were 17.3 +/- 9.6 months in Group 1 and 13.0 +/- 11.4 months in Group 2. Mean IOPs before laser procedures were 21.2 +/- 1.7 mmHg in Group 1 and 22.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg in Group 2 (P = 0.454). Postlaser IOP measurements of Group 1 were 12.1 +/- 3.4 mmHg and 13.8 +/- 1.7 mmHg in the 1st week and last visit, respectively; in Group 2, these measurements were 13.6 +/- 3.7 mmHg and 14.9 +/- 4.8 mmHg, respectively. There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) in IOP reduction at all visits in both groups; the results of the two groups were similar (P > 0.05). Mean follow-up was 16.6 +/- 6.4 months after SLT-GR and 18.9 +/- 11.2 months after Nd:YAG-GP. Conclusions: While conventional Nd:YAG-GP and SLT-GR, a novel procedure, are both effective choices in eyes resistant to viscocanalostomy, there are fewer complications with SLT-GR. SLT-GR can be an alternative to conventional Nd:YAG-GP.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOphthalmologyGlaucomaLaser goniopunctureNeodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum garnetViscocanalostomySelective laser trabeculoplastyOpen-angle glaucomaTerm-follow-upDeep sclerectomyCollagen implantDescemet membraneFemaleGlaucomaGonioscopyHumansIntraocular pressureLasers, solid-stateMaleMiddle agedPuncturesRetrospective studiesSurgical flapsSuture techniquesTrabecular meshworkTrabeculectomyArticle0003870619000052-s2.0-8499274587956857164827688277OphthalmologyTrabeculectomy; Open Angle Glaucoma; Intraocular PressureComparative studyDescemet membraneFemaleGlaucomaGonioscopyHumanIntraocular pressureMaleMiddle agedPathophysiologyPhysiologyProceduresPunctureRetrospective studySolid state laserSurgical flapsSuture techniqueTherapeutic useTrabecular meshworkTrabeculectomy