Vatansever, Kevser2023-01-272023-01-272017-01-14Civaner, M. M. vd. (2017). ''Ethical problems in an era where disasters have become a part of daily life: A qualitative study of healthcare workers in Turkey''. Plos One, 12(3).1932-6203https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174162https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174162http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30682Background: Natural disasters, armed conflict, migration, and epidemics today occur more frequently, causing more death, displacement of people and economic loss. Their burden on health systems and healthcare workers (HCWs) is getting heavier accordingly. The ethical problems that arise in disaster settings may be different than the ones in daily practice, and can cause preventable harm or the violation of basic human rights. Understanding the types and the determinants of ethical challenges is crucial in order to find the most benevolent action while respecting the dignity of those affected people. Considering the limited scope of studies on ethical challenges within disaster settings, we set upon conducting a qualitative study among local HCWs. Methods Our study was conducted in six cities of Turkey, a country where disasters are frequent, including armed conflict, terrorist attacks and a massive influx of refugees. In-depth interviews were carried out with a total of 31 HCWs working with various backgrounds and experience. Data analysis was done concurrently with ongoing interviews. Results Several fundamental elements currently hinder ethics in relief work. Attitudes of public authorities, politicians and relief organizations, the mismanagement of impromptu humanitarian action and relief and the media's mindset create ethical problems on the macro-level such as discrimination, unjust resource allocation and violation of personal rights, and can also directly cause or facilitate the emergence of problems on the micro-level. An important component which prevents humanitarian action towards victims is insufficient competence. The duty to care during epidemics and armed conflicts becomes controversial. Many participants defend a paternalistic approach related to autonomy. Confidentiality and privacy are either neglected or cannot be secured. Conclusion Intervention in factors on the macro-level could have a significant effect in problem prevention. Improving guidelines and professional codes as well as educating HCWs are also areas for improvement. Also, ethical questions exposed within this study should be deliberated and actualized with universal consensus in order to guide HCWs and increase humane attitudes.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessScience & technology - other topicsHumanitarianismProfessionalsDonationsAltruismAttitudeCodes of ethicsCommunications mediaConfidentialityHealth personnelHumansModels, theoreticalMoral obligationsOrganizations, nonprofitPersonal autonomyPoliticsPractice guidelines as topicProfessional-patient relationsQualitative researchRelief workTriageTurkeyInterviews as topicArticle0003989458000552-s2.0-8501593894612328319151Multidisciplinary sciencesDisaster; Aid Agencies; Ethical StandardsArticleConfidentialityDisasterDisaster planningEmergency health serviceEthicsHealth care personnelHealth care practiceHealth personnel attitudeHumanInterviewPatient autonomyPractice guidelinePrivacyProfessional competencePublic health serviceQualitative researchRelief workTerrorismTurkey (republic)WarAltruismAttitudeEthicsHealth care personnelMass mediumMedical ethicsMoralityNon profit organizationPersonal autonomyPoliticsProfessional-patientPsychologyTheoretical modelTurkeyElationshipRefugee