PubMed
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/24864
Browse
Browsing by browse.metadata.sponsorship "AbbVie"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Publication Association between clinical specialty setting and disease management in patients with psoriatic arthritis: Results from LOOP, a cross-sectional, multi-country, observational study(Wiley, 2020-01-30) Boehncke, W. H; Horvath, R.; Lima, S. A. L.; Okada, M.; Hojnik, M.; Ganz, F.; Lubrano, E.; Dalkılıç, Ediz; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Romatoloji Anabilim Dalı.; CMF-4757-2022; 6506739457Background Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and debilitating disease that can be managed by different clinical specialists. Objectives The objective of theLOOPstudy was to evaluate the impact of clinical specialty setting on the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with PsA. Clinical disease activity and disease burden were also compared between clinical settings. Methods LOOPwas a cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study conducted in 17 countries in Western and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. Adult patients (>= 18 years) with a suspected or established diagnosis of PsA who were routinely visiting a rheumatologist, dermatologist or non-rheumatology/non-dermatology physician were enrolled. All patients were assessed by both a rheumatologist and a dermatologist. Results Of 1483 enrolled patients, a total of 1273 had a confirmed diagnosis of PsA. There was no significant difference in the median time from onset of inflammatory musculoskeletal symptoms to PsA diagnosis between patients enrolled by rheumatologists and dermatologists (6.0 vs. 3.9 months). However, the median time from diagnosis to first treatment with a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) was significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting compared with the dermatology setting (0 vs. 2.0 months;P < 0.001). In addition, disease activity was significantly higher in the dermatology setting compared with the rheumatology setting. Conclusions Differences in the management and clinical status of patients with PsA were observed between the rheumatology and dermatology settings. Importantly, median time from diagnosis to first csDMARDwas significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting, and patients in the dermatology setting had higher disease activity. These data show the importance of improved collaboration between rheumatologists and dermatologists.Publication Residual low HDV viraemia is associated HDV RNA relapse after PEG-IFNa-based antiviral treatment of hepatitis delta: Results from the HIDIT-II study(Wiley, 2020-11-20) Bremer, Birgit; Anastasiou, Olympia E.; Hardtke, Svenja; Caruntu, Florin A.; Curescu, Manuela G.; Yalçın, Kendal; Akarca, Ulus S.; Zeuzem, Stefan; Erhardt, Andreas; Luth, Stefan; Papatheodoridis, George V.; Radu, Monica; İdilman, Ramazan; Manns, Michael P.; Cornberg, Markus; Yurdaydın, Cihan; Wedemeyer, Heiner; Gürel, Selim; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları.; HLH-8209-2023; 7003706434The role of low levels of HDV-RNA during and after interferon therapy of hepatitis D is unknown. We re-analysed HDV RNA in 372 samples collected in the HIDIT-2 trial (Wedemeyer et al, Lancet Infectious Diseases 2019) with the Robogene assay (RA; Jena Analytics). Data were compared with the previously reported in-house assay (IA). We detected HDV-RNA in one-third of samples previously classified as undetectable using the highly sensitive RA. Low HDV viraemia detectable at week 48 or week 96 was associated with a high risk for post-treatment relapse, defined as HDV RNA positivity in both assays at week 120. HDV RNA relapses occurred in 10/15 (67%) patients with detectable low HDV RNA at week 48 and in 10/13 (77%) patients with low viraemia samples at week 96. In contrast, the post-treatment relapse rate was lower in patients with undetectable HDV RNA in both assays during treatment.