2018 Cilt 11 Sayı 1
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/4907
Browse
Browsing by Language "en"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Commentary on “The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations”(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2017-06-27) Küçükömürler, Sanem; Özkan, TürkerMeaning Maintenance Model (MMM) was proposed by Heine, Proulx, and Vohs (2006) in the article named “The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations”. Additionally, writers were interested in four different motivations and suggested MMM as the underlying motivation among them. However, there is a questionable point in the article. The authors actually selected meaning maintenance motivation as the primary motivation, while it is still possible to select another one as the primary. Thus, questions related with the primary motivation claim are needed to be examined. Is meaning maintenance a primary motive? Is there any other triggering mechanism for meaning maintenance? Or is it possible to track the supports for meaning maintenance as demonstrating another mechanism? In this paper, specifically, the aim is to analyze the claim of ‘basic motivation’ made by Heine, Proulx, and Vohs (2006) from a different perspective within literature about uncertainty reduction.Item Critical evaluation of promoting participation of NGOs in the un Security Council(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2017-06-11) Bektaş, Mehmet Halil Mustafa; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi/Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü.Informal relationships have been developed between the UN Security Council (SC) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Some scholars and politicians have suggested that these informal relationships should be strengthened through the provision of more formal access mechanisms such as consultative status. On the other hand, increasing participation by NGOs on the SC is questioned by others on the grounds of accountability, fairness and objectivity, the purported threat to international legal order of such participation, and the undermining of the SC’s effectiveness. The current study critically evaluates these reservations regarding the promotion of access for NGOs to the SC. It examines whether or not the provision of formal access justifies these concerns, concluding that while some reservations might be valid, they should not be considered as insuperable obstacles. This is firstly because the SC could develop a mechanism for granting formal access to NGOs that could address these concerns, and secondly that, given that the SC itself already suffers from a lack of accountability, fairness, objectivity and effectiveness, such access by NGOs could help enhance the SC’s capacities in these areas. There is a limited amount of literature on increasing access for NGOs to the SC, but to the best of the author’s knowledge no study has evaluated criticisms of such access in particular, as opposed to NGO’s participation in international organizations in general. The present paper would therefore contribute to the literature in this regard.