Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comprehensive doctrines in the public sphere – A case for politicization
Authors: Jarymowicz, Tomasz
Keywords: Habermas
Religious reasons
Public sphere
Deliberative democracy
Issue Date: 30-Sep-2019
Publisher: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Citation: Jarymowicz, T. (2019). "Comprehensive doctrines in the public sphere – A case for politicization". Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 18(2), 289-303.
Abstract: The problem with religious reasons is not whether they should be present in the public sphere but how they should be present. Political theorists such as Jeremy Waldron, Juergen Habermas, and Christina Lafont have favored two approaches to making religion legitimate in the public sphere. They have either tried to work out the conditions under which religious reasons can contribute to public sphere in a fruitful way or they have drawn attention to the moral content of religious principles. However, I argue that the latter approach relies too heavily on the propositional content of religious arguments to the detriment of investigating how they are politicized in the public sphere. It is my conviction that without looking at how given religious morality is politicized, a false moral consensus is manufactured, which given the motivational pull of religion can be dangerous. Furthermore, the article makes a case for a more realistic idea of a public sphere where other comprehensive doctrines such as feminism or economism are taken into account as well. Moreover, the evaluation of religious reasons should include their relationship to a given background political culture, which will increase a critical edge of a political theory.
ISSN: 2645-8950
Appears in Collections:2019 Cilt 18 Sayı 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019_18_2_1.pdf303.26 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons